Tag Archive - Music Licensing

Shazam I love you

I personally want to thank Shazam for making me a better, more well informed
Music Supervisor. See, I am not the kind of Sup that can tell you the name to
every song I hear….I don’t need to, I have Shazam.

I look totally and completely annoying…..anywhere I might be, I keep my Shazam
ready to go so that at a moments notice, I can find out what is playing around me.

Have you ever been in a movie and someone randomly holds up their iPhone above
their head in the dark, blocking your view of the screen? That was most likely me.

Out to a nice dinner with my man……..I hear a good song….I hold my phone up.

The playoffs with a house full of friends…I run up to the TV and hold that phone
up.

I NEED TO KNOW….it’s my job…..right?

It seems silly…but imagine how many people are just as ridiculous as I am? This
is great news for you when you get your song licensed. It is another direct way for
a fan to identify with, connect with and purchase your music. IN LESS THAN 5 SECONDS.

You can also use Spotify to play the song you just tagged. I haven’t figured that out
yet, but guaranteed I will! Shazam has something like 150 million users globally.
BANANAS. And it is only getting bigger.

Twentieth Century Fox announced last month that they will be integrating it into TV
programming, allowing viewers to unlock additional content.

Hold on, did you hear that? CONTENT……you music is CONTENT, valuable content.

I am going to make a prediction right now. In less then 3 years advertisers and
entertainment companies will be giving away MUSIC CONTENT as a reward for engagement
through Shazam.

Know what that means? That on top of the license fee you will get, they will be serving
up a fee for pre-purchased downloads.

I love me some Shazam….so should you.

Hip-Hop music for UGG

I found this spot today on ADFREAK. It’s postable for several reason (ahhem), but most of all because it shows a GREAST use of Hip-Hop music in a TV commercial…..something you don’t see too often outside of sports….this is on the line fr sure, but a great use none-the-less. MOS DEF gets the love for his song Twilite Speedball.

Target Back to School

I wanted to post this spot because I think it is a great representation of “Happy, Upbeat Music with Vocal Instrumentation.” How many of you have a song like this? What is your STRATEGY for how to get that music to a potential buyer? If your answer is YES I DO HAVE A SONG, and NO I DON”T HAVE A PLAN….then make sure you check out some of my free training vids….lots of good stuff.

Where do Music Supervisors go to find music?

Knowledge is Protection and POWER in the music licensing world

This has been a great week. I always love product launch weeks because I get to connect with so many of you and hear your questions. I hope that you were able to take advantage of the training videos that I gave away this week, some of my best.

I diligently follow a few forums online that discuss Music Licensing, because as a consultant and educator, it’s my business to know what YOU need to understand in order to succeed.

I have made it my business to help Musicians succeed in the Music Licensing world.

Now that I think about it, this has been my business in different iterations since 1999 when I met Eric Hilton and Rob Garza of Thievery Corporation at a Music Festival in Iceland. They planted a seed inside my head that changed the course of my life forever. You can read my bio if you want to know more about that story.

When I started Ten Music in 2000, it was my job to REPRESENT Record Labels and Publishers to the Advertising community for the potential of licensing tracks. It was a very new model….there was no one else doing what I did, so there was a certain amount of  ”behind the curtain” in my job. My rolodex was mine and that was what my clients paid me for. It was the “agent mentality. I was trained to think that way. “Stand back while I go out and make magic happen for you.”

As time went on, I began to see that the clients of mine who KNEW the most about the music licensing business, TRUSTED me the most, and stayed the CLOSEST to me, were the ones who succeeded the most. Funny right?

It actually makes perfect sense. With KNOWLEDGE of that which you seek, you have a greater chance of success.

Now I am 3 years into my career as an educator, honing my craft and taking in information in a completely different way in order to feed it back to you in a way you can understand, digest and USE for yourselves. But one thing is still stands true.

KNOWLEDGE is the ultimate PROTECTION and POWER that an artist can have if they want to succeed.

Let’s think about that on a purely artistic level, like how you write a song, or how you get inspired to write a piece of music. The more you KNOW about how to play your respective instrument, the better you are. The more you KNOW about other music, the more you have inspiration.

So this theme felt appropriate to point out as I head into the second (and final) Workshop session for this year.

Here is the Question:

“Sarah, if I want to license my music, what should I do.”

LEARN….you need to learn….it will change everything you do and set you on a course that is tangent to what the business is looking for.

If you want to learn more about my workshop, you can do so HERE. Registration is open for a few more days or until the seats are filled (I am over half way filled in just one day).

http://bit.ly/GYMLWkReg

The workshop begins on July 12th and runs for 4 weeks.

Have an incredible holiday weekend!

Best,
Sarah

Music Libraries, Reps, Brokers, Online Music Supervisors……what's the difference?

I have just finished a fantastic speaking tour in Vancouver….thanks to everyone who came out and for your incredible enthusiasm.

One of the greatest benefits I get from teaching is to get out hear from YOU. It helps me understand what it is you need to know to move forward with your music career and how it relates to music licensing.

The theme for me lately has been “how to make music licensing a part of your business model as an artist.”

Every musician is different. Some of you are songwriters looking to have your songs covered and performed, others of you produce and perform your own music, while even some of you are non-touring musicians who are looking to take decades of talent and translate it into income.

In the same way, the music licensing business is more diverse then you think.

It’s a food chain, an ecosystem like any other. There are some projects and shows that are going to go for the hits, the best music out there. They have the budgets. Then there are projects that look steadfastly to the Indie and unsigned artists to license from both for the innovation, buzz and affordability. And then there is the library business.

The Music Library business has been a hot topic lately and one I am very intimately familiar with because I built one of the very first models online called HANK. It seemed such a DUH for me and my team when we developed HANK. A place online where those looking to license music could go and search by genre, tempo, mood and vocals. I took the Indie Labels and Publishers that I represented and hosted their music in HANK to allow our clients music to be available 24/7. I founded HANK in 2005 and launched in 2007.

The “Library” business or “Online Music Supervision” business was growing rapidly. They were popping up like rabbits. It was clear that the only scalable model was what I called the “something everything” model. This meant that anyone could submit their music into the system; the goal being to have the MOST tracks in your library. One company stood out in this sector of the business; Pump Audio. Investors agreed and they were steadfastly aquired by Getty Images in 2007 for 9 times their yearly revenue. It was an extraordinary sign of what was about to happen. The explosion, and I mean this figuratively and literally, of the online music library business.

I myself, chose a very different model, and one that ended up NOT being scalable financially. I chose to be selective about the content, to be exclusive and to take a smaller % of only up front fees. Right or wrong, it is the model I still believe in, but it was simply not sustainable financially.

Pump Audio was agressive on many levels, but they were groundbreaking in their revenue model. A model that has changed the music licensing business forever. For better or worse. They take 50% (I am hearing 70% now) of all revenue both front end licensing fees as well as back end royalties, which means that in order to collect on your behalf they must re-title your work and essentially re-assign the copyright non-exclusively.

See, until Pump Audio came into the game there were STOCK MUSIC companies that paid musicians and composers and up front fee to write on assignment for them. The Stock Music Co owned the master and the pub and the artist retained the writers share. This was a sustainable and fair model for many years.

Every time I speak about music licensing I am asked about Music Libraries and what I think about them. I think that the term MUSIC LIBRARY is just a term to describe a company. Other similar company types would be a MUSIC HOUSE (mainly servicing the advertising industry), a BROKER or REP, or even a sync centric PUBLISHER. All of these companies do the same thing; they represent your music for the potential of licensing it to a licensor.

Some of these companies use “online searchable databases” as their leading offering. To date I have seen no one in this space crack the code. Music Supervisors simply don;t have the time to look ourselves, we need to have the music spoon fed to us based on the briefs we send. Other companies take a Agent approach, like a REP or a BROKER. They have smaller rosters and more personal relationships.

The key difference here in all of these companies that you must look at is what portion of the business they service. Stock Music Houses and Music Libraries service the TV Networks that refuse to pay upfront master and publishing fees and will only pay back end. This is the ultimate numbers game. The Libraries load their content onto hard drives and deliver them to the respective clients whom have signed “blanket licensing deals” with. Simply put, the company pays one lump sum to use any of the tracks in the library as much as they want for the period of time allowed on the license (usually one year). Then each show Supervisor turns in a cue sheet and the Library collects the Public Performance royalty on the backend as additional compensation. This rings very similar to how ASCAP, BMI and SEASAC charge for bars and restaurants to play their music, and I would fair to guess they pay put the same way as well.

Reps and Brokers are going after the golden eggs at the top of the business, what I like to call the PREMIUM CONTENT. These are the hits – the hit makers and the tastemakers that have the talent and style that catches the ear of one of these reps, and they go to work trying to place that music in any one of the top TV shows or global and National TV ads where the placement fees average $5000-$100,000 for one license. Make no mistake, this is the top of the food chain.

So in summation of this overview, I give you this advice; think about your music diversely and honestly. Not every track is going to be GREAT, and many of them may not even be GOOD, but within these vastly different types of companies you have the opportunity to choose where your content belongs. The B sides? Great for a music library. The hits…..go for a rep.

Section out your music like this, ask friends for advice and keep doing your homework on all these companies. It’s a very very big business and more players enter it every day, which in my estimation is a GOOD thing……so lets check them out.

Yes, it can be overwhelming, so create a network with your colleagues and friends about whom they have spoken to and liked. Help one another, and in doing so you will help yourself.

 

Music Licensing Fees…..it's ain't so easy

There is one question I get asked more then any, ” what is the average price for that kind of music license?”

It’s a tough answer to give, and many of the conversations I have online with DIY Bands and Musicians lead me to say the same thing;  ”It’s all negotiable,” which of course is of no help to you whatsoever.

Two quick things for you today:

1.) An article that I believe is the best answer of averages I have found to date on what things are “worth” and what they “cost”, but REMEMBER, these costs are based on the perceived value of a track and that is in the mind of the owner and the buyer.  So check it out:

http://www.licensequote.com/blog/index.php/2010/07/license-pricing-research/

2.) This is an idea for how to get the best deal possible if you have been given a licensing contract and have no idea how to negotiate the best deal for yourself: ASK AN EXPERIENCED LICENSING REP TO DO IT FOR YOU. I love this idea and did it for several artists that ended up becoming clients in my day as a rep. It kills a few birds with one stone. You offer the rep a small % of the license fee to negotiate the contract on your behalf. This way you know you are getting the best deal possible, and maybe they will be motivated to take you on as a client because they see you as client that is making money!

Simple….but sometimes the best ideas are.

Happy Monday….now go kick some ass.

SG

Music Licensing & YouTube…….and how they are beginning to work together

It’s official folks, we have moved into the era of Sync Licensing 2.0.

Fees are down…competition is up. Right?

Depends on how you look at it. When I look at the business today I see:

- more opportunities for licensing songs on in TV shows and ads with growing cable and online content channels

- more opportunity to connect with your fan (and buyer) by licensing music

It’s a cup half full situation, not half empty.

The big question is not IF music licensing is good for creating fans and reaching potential buyers, but HOW. How many times have you heard a song on a TV Commercial or your favorite TV show and scrambled online to find out who it is? If you are like me; many. And, like me you have probably spent at least a half hour Googling only to land on an obscure forum page that might possibly host the name of the band whose music is in the commercial or show.

So why does it have to be so hard to find that information? It shouldn’t. It is the new frontier of music discovery by fans as a direct outcome of licensing your songs to Tv Shows and ads as the lead by YouTube.

In 2008 YouTube surpassed Yahoo as the #2 search engine in the world. Advertisers and TV networks have finally come on board and begun to use the “channel” as another distribution channel for their content. That makes YouTube the icing on the cake of getting a music license.

How you ask? TAGGING and LINKS.

Most every brand and TV show has a dedicated channel and every time they have a video (like an advertisement or an instructional video) they load it onto their YouTube channel.They also have the opportunity to add notes and TAGS. Tags are the keywords that you assign to the video that allow google to list it when you search for that same word. So if you get your music placed in  A Holiday Inn Express add, you need to make sure that when they add that spot to the YouTube channel that the name of your band is listed in the tags AND in the notes.

YouTube has added some additional features that can make the connection even easier for consumers. It’s called CONTENT ID, check it out – YouTube has provided a video to help explain what this is all about.

Content ID – YouTube

http://www.youtube.com/t/contentid

http://youtube-global.blogspot.com/2009/01/watch-it-on-youtube-then-click-to-buy.html

Now, I look at this BANNER, or TAG, or LINK (whatever you want to call it) and I see the opportunity for a BAND or and ARTIST to SELL RECORDS if a they license their music to a piece of film, whatever the form (tv commercial, tv show, trailer, or feature film) and get a DIRECT identifier that the music is yours and a link t iTunes to buy it. Now nothing would please me more than to be able to provide a solid example of Content ID in action, but I CAN”T FIND ONE. That’s right. After looking at ALOT of videos, this is the only one I found. Random Ad with a random song in it – but it demonstrates what I am talking about.

WOW – a revelation……..connectivity. Haven’t major labels been whining about how they can’t sell any more records, well here is  chance for anyone whose music is on YouTube to turn viewers into buyers.

I did a little recon on the issue this week and got pinged around from manager to label to digital distributor. I am still not 100% sure who is responsible for filing the music in behalf of the artist if they are signed to a major. I was actually waiting to publish this post until i had all that info until I got a link about a Jeep project today. Click on the image below to read the article.

First off, FINALLY the labels and Agencies understand that if you are going to pay alot of money for some music, then by god, make a lot of noise about it. Honk that publicity horn! Right???? It’s commerce…..right?

So then I decided that we are going to use these forthcoming spots by Chrysler Jeep featuring the music of Lenny Kravitz as an example of the YouTube Content ID program and see when they post these spots on the Jeep YouTube channel if they use the BUY THIS TRACK here tagging. Let’s see if the label is taking advantage of this opportunity.

I LOOOOOOVEEE a good stakeout.

Standby…

Vocals as the narrative in Music Licensing

I just got this email – Creativity highlighting the “Top 20 ads of the Week”

First off, let me just lay out my undying love for the artistry and wackiness of the Norweigans. Traktor (Directing collective), Kings of Convenience (band), Sondra Lerche (musician), Royksopp, Datarock…….the list goes on and on.

But, I have to admit, I don’t get the chance to see a lot of Norweigan ads.

The music on this one is fantastic. Can’t peg who it is though – please comment if you know. The lyrics cast this slightly offbeat narrative to the spot.

For those of you that cannot get the video to work (I have been told it’s touchy) here is the direct link:

http://creativity-online.com/work/nettbus-whoever-you-are/22223

Music Licensing in Commercials is the benchmark for winning a GRAMMY, according to The Colbert Report

Admittedly, I openly defend Musicians who put their music in commercials. I am biased. I think it’s a great source of income as well as an invaluable distribution channel.

The argument has gone mainstream.

Last night on THE COLBERT REPORT, Stephen Colbert went public with his vote for Best Alternative Album.

Funny stuff…take a look. So those of you that think it’s a sell out for Indie Artists to license their music to ads, take a look, cause 3 of arguably the biggest names in Indie music were willing not only to license their music to Zales, Victoria’s Secret, HP, Honda, Tommy Hilfiger, and Sony Ericsson but they were willing to go onto the Colbert Report and make fun of themselves for it.

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
MeTunes – Grammy Vote – Dan Auerbach, Patrick Carney & Ezra Koenig<a>
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog</a> Video Archive
Page 1 of 212»
© Sarah Gavigan